Students in a state are blocked from benefiting from scholarships until the governor takes two steps:
To opt in for 2027, Governors must complete IRS Form 15714, the “Advance Election to Participate Under Section 25F for 2027.” The simple, one-page form commits the state to providing the State SGO List but expressly forbids the state from doing so until the U.S. Department of the Treasury issues relevant guidance.
You can check out which 30 states have already filed Form 15714 at this IRS site. One other state—Kentucky—is expected to submit its form in July. Several other governors have indicated their willingness to opt in once they can review additional Treasury guidance.
Treasury has not yet issued guidance on the format or deadline for the State SGO Lists. However, Treasury has provided substantial details about the upcoming rules for 2027 so that any governor could feel confident opting in. Among other issues, they have explicitly confirmed that traditional public school students would be eligible and that Treasury would guard against fraud or abuse by taxpayers, SGOs, scholarship recipients, or education providers.
Even without draft rules, several points are already clear in statute (specifically IRC §25F(c)(5)) and in IRS guidance so far.
Governors or states will not be allowed to add to, or subtract from, the requirements for SGOs.
The law does not allow governors to set their own rules around SGOs operating in their states. This is federal tax law, and only the federal requirements are relevant to compliance.
Governors and other state leaders may, however, communicate policy priorities and highlight SGOs serving particular student populations — such as those focused on low-income students, military-connected students, or students with disabilities.
Governors are not a state’s only option.
Statute allows another “individual, agency, or entity” to make the official election so that students in the state can receive FSTC-funded scholarships. They must, however, be designated under State law to make such elections on behalf of the State with respect to Federal tax benefits.
Kansas, Kentucky, and North Carolina have already exercised this option.
The list of statutory requirements for operating as an SGO is clear and limited.
Section 25F of the IRS Code requires SGOs to:
In addition to the statutory requirements, Treasury and IRS have already indicated that in the course of implementing the law, SGOs will be expected to:
The statute gives each SGO control over the size of its scholarship size, the types of scholarships, and which students it serves within the parameters of the law. To be successful, SGOs must, of course, be able to raise contributions, mostly in $1,700 increments. As a result, the FSTC Coalition predicts that:
Congress has put in two important limitations on SGO designs:
The FSTC Coalition stands ready to help governors, state lawmakers, or their staff as states determine the best path for students in their state. Please feel free to reach out to jim.blew@theFSTCcoalition.org with any questions or concerns.
See where your state stands and what comes next.